← Back to Blog

How to Prioritize Features: A Simple Framework

Stop arguing about what to build next. This framework helps product teams make data-driven prioritization decisions using effort, impact, and strategic alignment.

"We should build everything!" said no successful product team ever. Yet prioritization remains one of the hardest challenges in product management.

Everyone has opinions: Sales wants enterprise features, engineering wants to refactor the backend, design wants to improve UX, and the CEO just returned from a conference with "one simple idea."

Here's a practical framework for cutting through the noise.

The Three-Dimensional Prioritization Model

Effective prioritization considers three dimensions:

  • Strategic Alignment: How well does this feature support our company strategy?
  • Business Impact: What's the expected ROI (revenue, retention, efficiency)?
  • Effort Required: How much time and resources will this consume?

The framework works by scoring each dimension, then using those scores to rank features automatically.

Step 1: Define Your Strategic Pillars

Before prioritizing individual features, identify your 3-5 strategic pillars for the year. Examples:

  • "Expand into enterprise market"
  • "Improve product reliability"
  • "Enable self-service onboarding"

Each pillar becomes a "project" in your roadmap. Features that don't map to a pillar should be questioned.

Step 2: Score Each Feature

For every feature, assign scores on a 1-5 scale:

Project Priority (Strategic Alignment)

  • 1: Core to primary company objective
  • 2: Important secondary objective
  • 3: Supports strategy but not critical
  • 4: Tangential benefit
  • 5: Unclear strategic value

Feature Priority (Business Impact)

  • 1: Game-changing impact (10x improvement, major revenue unlock)
  • 2: Significant measurable impact
  • 3: Moderate improvement
  • 4: Minor improvement
  • 5: Speculative or unmeasured benefit

Effort Weight

Estimate effort in points (10, 20, 40, 80), then calculate: Effort Weight = Math.ceil(effort / 10)

  • 10-point feature → Weight of 1
  • 20-point feature → Weight of 2
  • 40-point feature → Weight of 4

Step 3: Calculate Composite Score

Composite Score = Project Priority + Feature Priority + Effort Weight

Lower scores = higher priority. This means high-impact, low-effort, strategically-aligned features naturally rise to the top.

Example Comparison

Feature A: "Enterprise SSO"

  • Project Priority: 1 (Enterprise expansion pillar)
  • Feature Priority: 2 (Unlocks major deals)
  • Effort: 40 points → Weight: 4
  • Score: 1 + 2 + 4 = 7

Feature B: "Dark mode"

  • Project Priority: 4 (Not tied to key pillar)
  • Feature Priority: 3 (User request, moderate impact)
  • Effort: 20 points → Weight: 2
  • Score: 4 + 3 + 2 = 9

Feature A ranks higher (lower score) despite requiring more effort, because it has stronger strategic alignment and business impact.

Step 4: Distribute Across Quarters

Once ranked, distribute features across Q1-Q4:

  • Top 25%: Q1 (highest priority)
  • 25-50%: Q2
  • 50-75%: Q3
  • Bottom 25%: Q4

This creates a natural flow where your most important work happens first, with flexibility to adjust as quarters progress.

Handling Edge Cases

"But this feature is blocking a major customer deal!"

If it's truly blocking revenue, it should score Priority 1 for both strategic alignment and business impact. If it still ranks low, question whether it's really as critical as claimed.

"We need to pay down technical debt!"

Create a "Technical Foundation" project pillar. Technical debt that improves reliability, speed, or developer velocity should be prioritized like any feature. Debt that's just "nice to have" should rank accordingly.

"Our competitor just launched this feature!"

Competitive features should still pass through the prioritization framework. Not every competitor move deserves an immediate response.

Making Prioritization Transparent

The beauty of this framework is transparency. Instead of prioritization happening in closed-door meetings, everyone can see:

  • Why Feature X is in Q1 and Feature Y is in Q3
  • What would need to change for Feature Y to move up
  • How effort estimates impact priority

This reduces politics and increases trust. Stakeholders may disagree with your scores, but they can't claim the process is unfair.

Try this framework: Use our Roadmap Planner tool which implements this exact prioritization system. It automatically calculates scores and assigns features to quarters.